Mayu Crossley vs Francesca Pace Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 May at 03:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Crossley vs F. Pace

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crossley 1 - 0 Pace
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mayu Crossley winning 2 and Francesca Pace winning 1. The last match between Mayu Crossley and Francesca Pace was at the W15 Orlando, 18-05-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Mayu Crossley getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crossley | 1 |
| Pace | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Orlando(05-18-25)
M. Crossley vs F. Pace H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 71.74% (66-26) | Career Total W/L | 53.60% (67-58) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Crossley vs F. Pace Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Crossley has secured 35.1% of points on their second serve, whereas Pace has achieved 39.77%. Does this slight edge in second serve performance favor Pace? It may enhance their likelihood of winning.
- Return Game Efficiency: Crossley has outperformed Pace by winning 52.34% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Pace's 48.67%. On first serve returns, Crossley has won 36.96%, ahead of Pace's 31.82%. Could this return strength be crucial in determining the match winner?
- Handling Pressure: Crossley has successfully defended 43.22% of breakpoints, while Pace has saved 37.11%. Crossley appears more resilient under pressure, which could be beneficial in tightly contested matches.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Crossley has a higher match win percentage (68.29%) compared to Pace (60.34%), indicating Crossley's consistent performance advantage.
- Surface Proficiency: Both players excel on clay, but Crossley exhibits a superior win rate of 74% on this surface versus Pace's 53%. This could suggest Crossley holds the upper hand on clay courts.
- Event Level Experience: While playing predominantly at the Challengers/ITF level, Crossley has won 64.86% of matches, surpassing Pace's 55.88%. Does this difference in competitive success suggest Crossley is more adapted to these tournaments?
- Quality of Opponents: Crossley has faced players with a stronger average ranking (338.78) than Pace's opponents (383.47) over the past year. Facing tougher opponents could make Crossley more prepared for this match.
- Deciding Set Outcomes: Both players have an equal success rate in deciding sets, winning 50% of the time, which may suggest equal stamina or pressure handling in extended matches.
- Break Point Conversion: Crossley has converted slightly more breakpoints (40.13%) than Pace (39.39%). Could this suggest a marginal edge for Crossley in pivotal moments?
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming tennis match approaches, both players exhibit notable strengths but also have areas to improve. Crossley seems to have a clear advantage in several key areas, such as return game efficiency and handling pressure situations.
Their superior performance on clay and experience against tougher opponents could provide additional leverage, especially if the match becomes closely contested. Although Pace shows strengths in second serve points, Crossley displays consistent performance and better breakpoint defenses.
Despite Pace's competitive second serve performance, Crossley's broader advantages make them the likely winner in the forthcoming matchup.
Mayu Crossley vs Francesca Pace Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Crossley vs F. Pace H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:20:0 | Average Match Time | 1:20:0 |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve % | 69% (40/58) |
| 50% (16/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 47% (27/58) | Return Points Win % | 53% (27/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Crossley Recent Matches Played
F. Pace Recent Matches Played

M. Crossley vs F. Pace Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.74% (66/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.60% (67/58) |
| 68.14% (139/65) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.68% (154/144) |
| 58.19% (1091/784) | Games Win/Loss | 51.04% (1394/1337) |
| 69.77% (30/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.33% (21/15) |
| 75.00% (36/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.27% (46/42) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 74 | Aces Total | 213 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 282 | Total Double Faults | 540 |
| 1:28:54 | Average Match Time | 1:35:9 |
| 155.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 454.55 |
| 66% (3402/5144) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5019/7896) |
| 60% (2051/3402) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3014/5019) |
| 46% (810/1742) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1245/2877) |
| 51% (390/761) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (487/998) |
| 51% (2654/5213) | Return Points Win % | 47% (3566/7652) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 68.75% (55/25) | Challenger W/L | 52.00% (39/36) |
| 91.67% (11/1) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (28/21) |
| 71% (65/91) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (67/125) |
| 68% (17/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (8/23) |
| 62% (13/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (28/48) |
| 92% (63/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (56/50) |
| 8% (63/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (56/6) |
| 28% (29/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (69/17) |